Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Procedural justice and status: status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.
The current article explores status as an antecedent of procedural fairness effects (the findings that perceived procedural fairness affects people's reactions, e.g., their relational judgments). On the basis of the literature, the authors proposed that salience of the general concept of status leads people to be more attentive to procedural fairness information and that, as a consequence, stro...
متن کاملProcedural justice as autonomy regulation.
The present research investigated the relation between autonomy (i.e., freedom of choice) and procedural justice. Three studies tested the hypothesis that people would be particularly sensitive to the fairness of decision-making procedures when they experience deprivation of autonomy needs. Study 1 indicated that procedural justice judgments indeed were influenced more strongly by variations in...
متن کاملProcedural Justice and Innovation: Does Procedural Justice Foster Innovative Behavior?
The influence of procedural justice on intended innovative behavior was studied in a sample of students and employees. Although earlier studies suggests that procedural justice increases innovation-related behavior such as spontaneous cooperation, so far systematic research is scarce. Results indicated that the provision of voice increased participants’ intention to show innovative behavior suc...
متن کاملGame Mechanisms & Procedural Fairness
The main paper to which this abstract refers models procedural fairness and procedural justice, crucial concepts in the design and appraisal of social interaction [1]. Argumentation systems in particular owe the quality of their inferences to the quality of the procedure that produces them. We are interested in both games that can be justified without reference to substantive social purposes, s...
متن کاملProcedural Fairness and Tax Compliance.
In the traditional deterrence approach, taxpayers were considered as purely self-interested rational agents (Allingham & Sandmo 1972), and consequently, compliance was enforced by measures such as audits and sanctions. In the late nineties, a new method of regulation was proposed. This approach, the responsive regulation (Ayres & Braithwaite 1992), integrated the various measures to ensure comp...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
سال: 2002
ISSN: 0022-3514
DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1353